Sebi offers a minimum price range for IPOs, a sub-categorization of NIIs

Market regulator Sebi on Monday proposed a minimum price range of 5 percent for public issues through a process of book creation and sub-categorization of non-institutional investors.

Sebi has solicited comments on his proposals in a consultation paper for reviewing the price bracket and book-making framework for public issues. Comments can be submitted until October 20, 2021.

The recommendations came as Sebi observed that the price range provided by the issuing companies on the main board is extremely narrow.

Several concerns were the subject of deliberations by the Primary Market Advisory Committee (CCGA).

“The goal of a fair and transparent price discovery mechanism in a constructed book issue appears to have been diluted over time due to changing market practices,” he said.

A narrow price range offers an opportunity for an issuing company to camouflage a fixed price issue as a book build issue, thus bypassing the conditions / regulations attached to the fixed price method, in particular related to the allocation methodology, a-t -he adds.

PMAC recommended that a minimum price bracket for all public broadcasts through the book-making process could be set at 5 percent. This would mean that the top price will be at least 5 percent above the floor price.

Sebi also asked if a minimum price bracket was needed in public issues and, if so, what should it be.

In accordance with capital issuance standards and disclosure requirements, an initial public offering (IPO) can be made by two methods: book building or the fixed price method.

In the case of a book-building method, the issuer provides a price range in which the upper end must not be more than 20 percent above the floor price.

Sebi also raised concerns about the current methodology for proportional attribution to non-institutional investors (NIIs), which carries some risk when very large requests for a few NIIs result in foreclosure of other NIIs.

The regulator analyzed oversubscribed IPOs between January 2018 and April 2021 and observed that in 29 IPOs, on average, around 60% of applicants in the NII category did not receive any awards.

“Any public offering is expected to aim to provide as diverse an offering as possible with fair opportunities at the retail and non-institutional level,” Sebi said.

As the number of smaller NIIs continues to grow, the committee proposed a sub-categorization of NIIs into two categories.

In the first sub-category, one third of the allocation allocated to NIIs will be intended for application sizes between more than Rs 2 lakh and Rs 10 lakh.

For the second sub-category, he proposed that two-thirds of the allocation reserved for NIIs be intended for requests exceeding Rs 10 lakh.

“In addition, the proportional allocation in case of category NII may be discontinued and allocation by lottery will be introduced, as is currently applicable for category RII”, in accordance with the committee’s proposal.

RII refer to individual retail investors.

(Only the title and image of this report may have been reworked by Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is automatically generated from a syndicated feed.)

Dear reader,

Business Standard has always strived to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that matter to you and have broader political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering has only strengthened our resolve and commitment to these ideals. Even in these difficult times resulting from Covid-19, we remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and cutting edge commentary on relevant current issues.
However, we have a demand.

As we fight the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more so that we can continue to provide you with more quality content. Our subscription model has received an encouraging response from many of you who have subscribed to our online content. More subscriptions to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of providing you with even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practice the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital editor


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *